US v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385
Defendant's drug manufacturing conviction is affirmed where: 1) defendant could not show that the police invaded an area in which he possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy when they walked up his driveway and attached a tracking device to his vehicle; and 2) the police did not conduct an impermissible search of defendant's car by monitoring its location with mobile tracking devices.
Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009
Filed January 11, 2010
Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain
Harrison Latto, Portland, OR
Amy E. Potter and Judith R. Harper, Assistant United States Attorneys for the District of Oregon, Medford, OR
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.