Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385

By FindLaw Staff on January 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's drug manufacturing conviction is affirmed where: 1) defendant could not show that the police invaded an area in which he possessed a reasonable expectation of privacy when they walked up his driveway and attached a tracking device to his vehicle; and 2) the police did not conduct an impermissible search of defendant's car by monitoring its location with mobile tracking devices.

Read US v. Pineda-Moreno, No. 08-30385

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009

Filed January 11, 2010


Opinion by Judge O'Scannlain


For Appellant:

Harrison Latto, Portland, OR

For Appellee:

Amy E. Potter and Judith R. Harper, Assistant United States Attorneys for the District of Oregon, Medford, OR

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard