Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Treadwell, No. 08-50562

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Defendants' wire fraud convictions and sentences are affirmed where: 1) 18 U.S.C. section 1343 did not require an intent to cause pecuniary loss; 2) "preponderance of the evidence" was the appropriate standard of proof for determining the amount of loss caused by the conspiracy; and 3) the district court correctly found the scope of relevant conduct under U.S.S.G. section 1B1.3 in attributing losses to defendants as a result of their conspiracy convictions.

Read US v. Treadwell, No. 08-50562

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted November 3, 2009

Filed January 28, 2010


Opinion by Judge Gould


For Appellants:

David J. Zugman, Burcham & Zugman, San Diego, CA

Jami L. Ferrara, Law Office of Jami L. Ferrara, San Diego, CA

For Appellee:

William P. Cole, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard