Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Truong, No. 08-10446

By FindLaw Staff on December 02, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's sentence for possessing unauthorized access devices is affirmed where: 1) nothing in either the plain language of 18 U.S.C. section 1029 or the case law required that an "access device" contain information identifying a particular person as its owner; and 2) the district court sufficiently explained that the Guidelines did not account for defendant's particular type of recidivism.

Read US v. Truong, No. 08-10446

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted September 14, 2009

Filed December 1, 2009


Per Curiam


For Appellant:

Joseph J. Wiseman, Law Offices of Joseph J. Wiseman, Davis, CA

For Appellee:

Lawrence G. Brown and Matthew D. Segal, Office of the United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard