US v. Truong, No. 08-10446
Defendant's sentence for possessing unauthorized access devices is affirmed where: 1) nothing in either the plain language of 18 U.S.C. section 1029 or the case law required that an "access device" contain information identifying a particular person as its owner; and 2) the district court sufficiently explained that the Guidelines did not account for defendant's particular type of recidivism.
Read US v. Truong, No. 08-10446
Argued and Submitted September 14, 2009
Filed December 1, 2009
Joseph J. Wiseman, Law Offices of Joseph J. Wiseman, Davis, CA
Lawrence G. Brown and Matthew D. Segal, Office of the United States Attorney, Sacramento, CA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.