Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Valverde, No. 09-10063

By FindLaw Staff on December 29, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Dismissal of SORNA Indictment Affirmed

In US v. Valverde, No. 09-10063, a prosecution under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act, the court affirmed the dismissal of the indictment where the Attorney General's interim regulation of February 28, 2007 -- applying SORNA's registration requirements retroactively to sex offenders, such as defendant, who were convicted before the statute's enactment -- did not comply with the notice and comment procedures of the Administrative Procedure Act, and did not qualify for the "good cause" exemption under 5 U.S.C. section 553(d)(3).

  • As the court wrote:  "The Government appeals a decision of the district court dismissing the indictment of Mark Anthony Valverde ("Valverde") under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), 42 U.S.C. § 16901 et seq., on the ground that the registration and penalty provisions of the statute under which Valverde was charged, 42 U.S.C. § 16913; 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a)(2)(B), are invalid exercises of congressional power under the Commerce Clause. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 3."

    Related Resources

    You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

    Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

    Or contact an attorney near you:
    Copied to clipboard