Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Washington, No. 08-35794

By FindLaw Staff on December 11, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an Indian tribe's appeal from the district court's denial of the tribe's Rule 60(b) motion to reopen the judgment in a matter in which the tribe had been denied fishing rights under the Treaty of Point Elliott, the order is affirmed where recognition proceedings and the fact of the tribe's recognition had no effect on the establishment of treaty rights at issue in this case.

Read US v. Washington, No. 08-35794

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted June 2, 2009

Filed December 11, 2009


Opinion by Judge Canby


For Appellant:

Mason D. Morisset, Morisset, Schlosser, Jozwiak & McGaw, Seattle, WA

James M. Jannetta, Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, La Conner, Wa

For Appellee:

Elizabeth Ann Peterson, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, DC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard