Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Weissburg v. Lancaster Sch. Dist., No. 08-55660

By FindLaw Staff on January 14, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action seeking attorney's fees based on an administrative proceeding under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act in which an Administrative Law Judge concluded that defendant school district misclassified the disability of plaintiffs' son, dismissal of the action is reversed where: 1) plaintiffs were a prevailing party because the change in the student's disability classification legally entitled the child to instruction by teachers qualified to teach students with both mental retardation and autism; and 2) even though parents were not eligible to receive attorneys' fees when they represented their children themselves, a parent was eligible to receive attorneys' fees when a non-parent relative provided legal representation for their child.

Read Weissburg v. Lancaster Sch. Dist., No. 08-55660

Appellate Information

Argued and Submitted October 8, 2009

Filed January 14, 2010


Opinion by Judge Pregerson


For Appellants:

Diane B. Weissburg, Diane Bargara Weissburg Law Offices, Marina del Rey, CA

For Appellees:

Carol J. Grogan, Schools Legal Service, Bakersfield, CA

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard