Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Aczel v. Labonia, No. 08-2741

By FindLaw Staff on October 12, 2009 1:07 PM

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging excessive force by police, judgment for defendant-officer is affirmed where, because the jury unanimously found that defendant was entitled to qualified immunity and there was no flaw in the finding that required the district court to reject it, the district court acted within its discretion in entering judgment for defendant and denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial.

Read Aczel v. Labonia, No. 08-2741

Appellate Information

Argued: May 27, 2009

Decided: October 9, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Leval

Counsel

For Appellant:

Keith P. Sturges, Goldstein and Peck, P.C., Bridgeport, CT

For Appellees:

Thomas R. Gerarde, Howd & Ludorf, LLC, Hartford, CT

Copied to clipboard