Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Civil Rights and Criminal Matters

By FindLaw Staff on March 11, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

US v. Awad, No. 07-4483, involved defendants' appeal from an order of criminal forfeiture against defendants pursuant to 21 U.S.C. section 853.  The court of appeals affirmed the order, on the ground that section 853 permitted imposition of a money judgment on a defendant who possesses no assets at the time of sentencing.

Huth v. Haslun, No. 08-2203, concerned an action claiming that defendants, who were employees of the New York State Thruway Authority, violated plaintiff's rights under the First Amendment by initiating disciplinary proceedings against her resulting in her demotion.  The court of appeals reversed the denial of summary judgment based on qualified immunity, holding that 1) the conduct that resulted in plaintiff's demotion did not qualify as speech protected from retaliation by the First Amendment; and 2) plaintiff could not assert a claim on behalf of her coworker because that coworker suffered no infringement of her own constitutional rights.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard