Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cornejo v. Bell, No. 08-3069

By FindLaw Staff on January 05, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action based on actions taken by the employees of the New York City Administration for Children's Services in connection with an investigation into the death of plaintiff's infant son, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) the lawyer defendants were fulfilling functions similar to a prosecutor and were thus entitled to absolute immunity; and 2) caseworker defendants essentially functioned much more like investigators than prosecutors, so they were not entitled to absolute immunity, but they were nonetheless entitled to qualified immunity.

Read Cornejo v. Bell, No. 08-3069

Appellate Information

Argued: October 7, 2009

Decided: January 4, 2010


Opinion by Judge Rakoff


For Appellant:

Carolyn A. Kubitschek, Lansner & Kubitschek, New York, NY

For Appellee:

Janet L. Zaleon, Michael A. Cardozo, Kristin M. Helmers, City of New York Law Department, New York, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard