Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Denial of Terrorism Enhancement on a Sentence Vacated, and Other Criminal Matter

By FindLaw Staff on June 14, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Urinyi v. US, No. 09-3398, involved petitioner's motion for leave to file a "second or successive" motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 2255.  The court of appeals denied the petition, on the ground that petitioner's prior motion did not count when determining whether his proposed motion was "second or successive" under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, and thus petitioner did not require leave of the court to file the proposed motion in the district court.

In US v. Awan, No. 07-4315, the court of appeals vacated defendant's conspiracy to commit murder sentence, holding that the district court erred by denying the U.S.'s request for imposition of a terrorism enhancement, because the district court failed to consider application of the "intended to promote" prong of U.S.S.G. section 3A1.4 and misconstrued the "involved" prong.

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard