Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Hayden v. Pataki, No. 04-3886

By FindLaw Staff on January 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a Due Process and Equal Protection Clause challenge to New York's felon disenfranchisement laws, judgment on the pleadings for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiffs' amended complaint failed to allege any facts as to discriminatory intent behind the legislature's adoption of the state constitutional provision at issue; and 2) there was a rational basis for the statutes' distinction between felons sentenced to incarceration or serving parole and those sentenced to probation.

Read Hayden v. Pataki, No. 04-3886

Appellate Information

Argued: October 26, 2007

Decided: January 28, 2010


Opinion by Judge Straub


For Appellants:

Juan Cartagena, Risa Kaufman, Craig Acorn and Paul Keefe, Community Service Society of New York, New York, NY

For Appellees:

Benjamin N. Gutman and Michelle Aronowitz, Deputy Solicitor Generals, New York, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard