Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Jova v. Smith, No. 08-2816

By FindLaw Staff on September 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by prisoners claiming that defendant prison personnel infringed their right to practice their religion under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part where the restrictions imposed on plaintiffs' practice were justified by powerful security and administrative interests, but reversed in part where defendants did not demonstrate that the religious/meatless alternative menu was the least restrictive means of furthering their compelling administrative interests.

Read Jova v. Smith, No. 08-2816

Appellate Information

Submitted: July 7, 2009

Decided: September 28, 2009


Per Curiam


For Appellants:

Tyheem Y. Keesh and Jesus M. Jova, pro se, Wallkill, NY

For Appellees:

Julie S. Mereson, Assistant Solicitor General, and Barbara D. Underwood, Solicitor General, Albany, NY

Was this helpful?

Thank you. Your response has been sent.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard