Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Lonecke v. Citigroup Pension Plan, No. 08-0459

By FindLaw Staff on October 19, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an ERISA action claiming that defendant's benefit plan violated ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules, partial summary judgment for plaintiffs is reversed where the plan complied with ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules, and defendant did not violate ERISA's section 204(h) notice requirements.

Read Lonecke v. Citigroup Pension Plan, No. 08-0459

Appellate Information

Argued: March 20, 2009

Decided: October 19, 2009


Opinion by Judge Wesley


For Appellants:

Myron D. Rumeld, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY

Lewis R. Clayton, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, New York, NY

For Appellees:

Edgar Pauk, Law Office of Edgar Pauk, Esq., Brooklyn, NY

Brad Nelson Friedman, Milberg LLP, New York, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard