Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., No. 10-889

By FindLaw Staff on November 22, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Denial of Motion to Compel Arbitration Affirmed

In Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., No. 10-889, plaintiffs' appeal from the denial of their motion to compel arbitration, the court affirmed where, assuming for the sake of argument that plaintiffs possessed a right to arbitration, plaintiffs waived that right by expressing the intent to resolve the dispute through litigation.


As the court wrote:  "Plaintiffs-appellants Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District and the State of Louisiana (collectively, "LSED") appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Chief Judge), denying their motion to compel arbitration in their dispute with defendants-appellees Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("MLPFS") and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (jointly, "defendants"). Assuming for the argument that LSED possessed a right to arbitration, the District Court held that LSED had waived that right by expressing its intent to resolve the dispute through litigation. In re Merrill Lynch Auction Rate Secs. Litig., 09 MD 2030 (LAP), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12764 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2010). We affirm."

Related Resources

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard