Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., No. 10-889
Denial of Motion to Compel Arbitration Affirmed
In Louisiana Stadium & Exposition Dist. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc., No. 10-889
, plaintiffs' appeal from the denial of their motion to compel arbitration, the court affirmed where, assuming for the sake of argument that plaintiffs possessed a right to arbitration, plaintiffs waived that right by expressing the intent to resolve the dispute through litigation.
As the court wrote: "Plaintiffs-appellants Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District and the State of Louisiana (collectively, "LSED") appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Loretta A. Preska, Chief Judge), denying their motion to compel arbitration in their dispute with defendants-appellees Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated ("MLPFS") and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (jointly, "defendants"). Assuming for the argument that LSED possessed a right to arbitration, the District Court held that LSED had waived that right by expressing its intent to resolve the dispute through litigation. In re Merrill Lynch Auction Rate Secs. Litig., 09 MD 2030 (LAP), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12764 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 8, 2010). We affirm."
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.