Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

NGM Ins. Co. v. Blakely Pumping, Inc., No. 09-1655

By FindLaw Staff on February 01, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by an insurer seeking a declaration that it was not obligated to defend its insured in a personal injury action, summary judgment for defendant is reversed where the policy at issue did not cover defendant's auto under any circumstances and, therefore, the district court erred in finding that New York Insurance Law section 3420(d)(2) required plaintiff to timely disclaim coverage.

Read NGM Ins. Co. v. Blakely Pumping, Inc., No. 09-1655

Appellate Information

Argued: December 10, 2009

Decided: February 1, 2010


Per Curiam


For Appellant:

Haydn J. Brill, Brill & Associates, P.C., New York, NY

For Appellee:

Robert D. Cook, Cook, Netter, Cloonan, Kurtz & Murphy, P.C., Kingston, New York

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard