Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., No. 08-3477

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In defendant's appeal from the district court's order vacating portions of an order of maritime attachment and garnishment, the order is affirmed in part where electronic fund transfers (EFTs) being processed by an intermediary bank are not property subject to attachment under Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.  However, the court of appeals remands the cause for further proceedings with respect to the remaining portions of the attachment order affecting EFTs of which defendant was the originator.

Read Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., No. 08-3477

Appellate Information

Argued: May 5, 2009

Decided: October 16, 2009


Opinion by Judge Cabranes


For Appellant:

Jeremy J.O. Harwood, Blank Rome LLP, New York, NY

For Appellee:

Rahul Wanchoo, Glen Rock, NJ

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard