Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In defendant's appeal from the district court's order vacating portions of an order of maritime attachment and garnishment, the order is affirmed in part where electronic fund transfers (EFTs) being processed by an intermediary bank are not property subject to attachment under Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions. However, the court of appeals remands the cause for further proceedings with respect to the remaining portions of the attachment order affecting EFTs of which defendant was the originator.
Argued: May 5, 2009
Decided: October 16, 2009
Opinion by Judge Cabranes
Rahul Wanchoo, Glen Rock, NJ
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.