Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Pearson, No. 07-0142

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Sentence for producing, transporting, receiving, and possessing child pornography is vacated and remanded further sentencing proceedings where a restitution order pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2259 may include an amount for estimated future medical expenses, but the district court did not explain adequately its calculation of the restitution amount in the order. The district court's judgment of conviction is affirmed in all other respects. 

Appellate Information
Appeal from the United States District Court for Northern District of New York.
Submitted: May 20, 2009
Decided: July 2, 2009

Judges
Before MINER, KATZMANN, and RAGGI, Circuit Judges.
Per Curium Opinion 

Counsel
For Appellant: Paul D. Silver, Steve Grocki, US Attorney's Office, Albany, NY.

For Defendant: Laurie S. Hershey, Manhasset, NY.

irnphkg49j

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard