Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Rigas, No. 08-3485

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Defendants' securities fraud sentences are affirmed where: 1) the district court was required to resentence defendants de novo following the reversal of a portion of defendants' convictions by another panel of the court of appeals; 2) based on the district court's alternative ruling, under which it did sentence defendants de novo, their sentences were reasonable. Also, there was no error with regard to denials of defendants' motions for a new trial and to compel discovery.

Read US v. Rigas, No. 08-3485

Appellate Information

Argued: May 5, 2009

Decided: October 5, 2009


Opinion by Judge Cabranes


For Appellants:

Stephen R. McAllister, Thompson Ramsdell & Qualseth, P.A., Lawrence, KS

Neal K. Katyal, Morgan Legal Consulting, Washington, D.C.

For Appellee:

William F. Johnson and Katherine Polk Failla, Assistant United States Attorneys, New York, NY

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard