Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Rossi, No. 08-6108

By FindLaw Staff on January 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an insurance fraud prosecution, the district court's amended restitution order is affirmed where the provisions of the governing statute in this case, the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982, were complied with because, inter alia, the restitution order was imposed at the time that defendant was resentenced following the court of appeals' remand, and defendant did not show that she was prejudiced by the lapse of time preceding resentencing.

Read US v. Rossi, No. 08-6108

Appellate Information

Argued: November 18, 2009

Decided: January 28, 2010


Per Curiam


For Appellant:

Richard Ware Levitt, Levitt & Kaizer, New York, NY

For Appellee:

Jesse M. Furman and Rebecca A. Rohr, Assistant United States Attorneys, New York, NY

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard