Brooks v. Rothe, No. 08-1099
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging a wrongful arrest, dismissal of plaintiff's claims on qualified immunity grounds is affirmed where the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement applied because there was a danger that evidence would be imminently destroyed.
Read Brooks v. Rothe, No. 08-1099
Argued: June 17, 2009
Decided and Filed: August 21, 2009
Opinion by Judge Gilman
Dissent by Judge Moore
Jason J. Liss, Fabian, Sklar & King, P.C., Farmington Hills, MI
Megan K. Cavanagh, Garan Lucow Miller, P.C., Detroit, MI
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.