Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Cooey v. Strickland, No. 09-4300

By FindLaw Staff on November 25, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's order staying defendant's execution, based on preexisting litigation related to challenges to Ohio's method of execution including challenges stemming from the State's use of a three-drug protocol and its difficulty accessing usable veins in prior executions, is vacated as any challenge to Ohio's three-drug execution protocol is now moot because such procedure will not be utilized on defendant, and no basis exists for continuing the stay previously in effect. 

Read Cooey v. Strickland, No. 09-4300

Appellate Information

Decided and Filed: November 25, 2009


Per Curium Opinion

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard