Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Eckerman v. Tennesee Dep't of Safety, 09-6181

By FindLaw Staff on December 20, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Patrolman's civil rights suit against the Department of Safety

Eckerman v. Tennesee Dep't of Safety, 09-6181, concerned a patrolman's civil rights suit claiming that he was demoted from lieutenant to sergeant and suffered other minor employment actions and retaliation due to his political support for Republican candidates and because he had filed a separate federal lawsuit against the Department of Safety in 2006 alleging discrimination based on political affiliation.

In reversing and remanding the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in holding that the reasons articulated by the Department of Safety provided justification for the adverse employment action, the court held that the reasons for the demotion were precisely the same reasons that a neutral administrative law judge in her final decision found untrue and could not warrant the demotion, and as such, the facts found in the administrative proceeding by the ALJ are res judicata in this proceeding.  Thus, on remand, the jury must be advised of the findings of the ALJ in the administrative proceeding and the jury should then determine whether the Department's demotion of plaintiff was based on activity protected by the First Amendment.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard