Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 05-4031

By FindLaw Staff on February 12, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a general contractor's suit against its insurers claiming that they had a duty to defend it in third-party litigation arising out of a construction dispute, judgment in favor of defendants is reversed as the exclusion provision at issue applies only to the cost of repairing or replacing distinct component parts on which the insured performed defective work.   

Read  Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co., No. 05-4031

Appellate Information

Argued: January 22, 2010

Decided and Filed: February 12, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge  Kethledge


For Appellant:   Michael L. Fortney, Fortney & Klingshirn

For Appellee:    Kathleen A. Sweitzer, Tressler Soderstrom Maloney & Priess, LLP

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard