Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock, No. 08-2578

By FindLaw Staff on January 28, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In plaintiff's retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against a town and one of its supervisors, partial grant of defendant's motion for summary judgment regarding the First Amendment retaliation claim is reversed and remanded where plaintiff's factual allegations were sufficient to raise more than a mere possibility of unlawful First Amendment retaliation on the part of the defendants, and thus, the district court erred in granting the motion to dismiss on the pleadings as to that part of the complaint. 

Read Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock, No. 08-2578

Appellate Information

Argued: October 9, 2009

Decided and Filed: January 28, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge  Clay


For Appellant:  William Frank Piper, William F. Piper PLC

For Appellee:   James R. Nelson, Scholten Fant PC

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard