Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

Hance v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 07-5475

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

In an action under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) claiming that Defendant terminated Plaintiff based on his military service, judgment for Plaintiff is affirmed where evidence of anti-military animus from a decisionmaker, combined with the close temporal relationship between Plaintiff's leave for military service and his discharge, were sufficient to support the District Court's finding that Plaintiff was discharged in violation of USERRA.

Read Hance v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 07-5475

Appellate Information

Argued: June 5, 2008

Decided and Filed: July 1, 2009

Judges

Per Curiam

Counsel

For Appellant:

James Stanton Whitehead, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL

For Appellee:

K. Cody Allison, Tiller Allison, Nashville, TN

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard