Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Jones v. Byrnes, No. 08-1889

By FindLaw Staff on November 09, 2009 11:12 AM

In plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action against two police officers on behalf of the estate of her husband arising from a high speed chase of armed robbery suspects that killed her husband in an automobile crash, summary judgment in favor of the defendant police officers is affirmed where: 1) the estate did not establish a prima facie case of deprivation of the husband's substantive due process rights as officers' actions of trying to apprehend what they reasonably believed to be dangerous criminals do not shock the conscience; and 2) in the alternative, even if the officers' actions did rise to the level of violating the husband's constitutional rights, it was not clearly established at the time of the incident that actions of that sort crossed the constitutional line. 

Read Jones v. Byrnes, No. 08-1889

Appellate Information

Argued: October 9, 2009

Decided and Filed: November 9, 2009

Judges

Per Curium Opinion

Counsel

For Appellant:  Joel B. Sklar, Law Office, Detroit, Michigan.

For Appellee:  Joseph Nimako, Cummings McClorey Davis & Acho, PLC., Livonia, Michigan

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard