Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Miller v. City of Cincinnati, 08-4679, involved a plaintiffs' section 1983 suit against the city of Cincinnati, claiming that the city's regulation governing access to the interior spaces of city hall violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments. In affirming the district court's grant of plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, the court held that the district court properly enjoined enforcement of Administrative Regulation #5 on the basis of the plaintiffs' free speech and void-for-vagueness claims because plaintiffs have established a substantial likelihood of success on these claims, and there appears to be no issue as to the existence of the remaining preliminary injunction factors.
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: