Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Moulton v. US Steel Corp., No. 08-2311

By FindLaw Staff on September 22, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In a class action lawsuit by the neighbors of a steel mill owned by United States Steel Corporation, district court's approval of a settlement is affirmed for the most part where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in approving the release of the continuing-nuisance claims as the release is not far-reaching and it is not unfair, unreasonable or inadequate; 2) class-member awards of $300 is not unconscionably low as this objection is based on the misconception that the agreement releases all future tort claims; and 3) district court's approval of the attorney's fees award is vacated and remanded for further explanation. Finally, district court did not err by corralling the extent of an attorney's involvement in the case and the rest of his objections are rejected.     

Read Moulton v. US Steel Corp., No. 08-2311

Appellate Information

Argued: August 4, 2009

Decided and Filed: September 21, 2009


Opinion by Judge Sutton 


For Appellant:  James P. Murphy, Berry Moorman PC

For Appellee:  J. Van Carson, Squire, Sanders & Dempsey LLP.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard