Ruling on Relation Back Issue in Wal-Mart Employees' Carbon Monoxide Exposure Action
In Asher v. Unarco Material Handling, Inc., No. 09-5158, the Sixth Circuit faced a challenge to the district court's dismissal of a suit, brought by a second group of past and present Wal-Mart employees', claiming injuries caused by exposure to carbon monoxide gas in an enclosed freezer section of Wal-Mart Distribution Center.
As stated in the decision: "[I]n urging Rule 15(c)'s applicability to their claims, the new plaintiffs concede significant ground. They acknowledge that this court has on several occasions made blanket statements to the effect that amendments which add a party to the original suit cannot relate back for limitation purposes."
Thus, in upholding the district court's dismissal, the court concluded that the new plaintiffs have cited no authority permitting relation back to the filing date of the original plaintiffs' claims and that the district court did not err in holding that Kentucky's "discovery rule" did not apply to toll the statute of limitations.
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.