Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Rulings in a Maritime Shipping Case for Rusting Steel Coils and a Criminal Case

By FindLaw Staff on March 10, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a criminal case and a maritime shipping case.

In Fortis Corp. Ins. SA. v. Viken Ship Mgmt. AS, No. 08-4478, the court decided a maritime shipping case involving a claim for rust damage to steel coils caused by exposure to seawater.  In affirming the district court's judgment the court held that a ship manager charged with providing a Master, officers and crew, and performing various other ship-management tasks for the shipping vessel is not a "carrier" under the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA), and as such, the one year statute of limitations does not bar the underlying suit.  The court also concluded that the district court's finding of negligence was not based on clearly erroneous factual findings.

In US v. Almany, No. 08-6027, the court faced a challenge to the district court's sentencing of a defendant convicted of drug and firearm related crimes. In remanding the case for resentencing, the court first addressed the issue of defendant's waiver of appeal and held that the district court committed plain error by failing to probe defendant's understanding of the appellate waiver provision of his plea agreement.  Next, the court held that the district court erred by sentencing defendant to both a five-year mandatory minimum under the firearm statute and a ten-year mandatory minimum under the drug statute.

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard