Rutherford v. Columbia Gas, No. 08-3148
In an action challenging a gas company's ability to maintain its pipeline easement by clearing certain trees from plaintiff's land, judgment for defendant is affirmed where a cleared right of way was reasonably necessary to serve the purpose of the easement.
Argued: June 17, 2009
Decided and Filed: July 30, 2009
Opinion by Judge Rogers
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Clay
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.