Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Rutherford v. Columbia Gas, No. 08-3148

By FindLaw Staff on July 30, 2009 1:03 PM

In an action challenging a gas company's ability to maintain its pipeline easement by clearing certain trees from plaintiff's land, judgment for defendant is affirmed where a cleared right of way was reasonably necessary to serve the purpose of the easement.

Read Rutherford v. Columbia Gas, No. 08-3148

Appellate Information

Argued: June 17, 2009

Decided and Filed: July 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Rogers

Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Clay

Counsel

For Appellant:

Steven T. Greene, Morrow, Gordon & Byrd, Ltd., Newark, OH

For Appellee:

John P. Lavelle, Lavelle & Associates, Athens, OH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard