Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Sanctions Imposed in Misappropriation of Trade Secrets Suit Vacated

By FindLaw Staff on April 21, 2010 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

BDT Prod., Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc., No. 08-6140, involved a challenge to the district court's grant of defendants' motion for attorney fees and imposition of sanctions to the extent of those fees, arising from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant in a suit brought by its one-time partners claiming that defendant had misappropriated trade secrets in developing a printer tray that substantially resembled a tray developed by plaintiff.

First, because sanctions under 28 U.S.C. section 1927 may be imposed only on individual attorneys, and not law firms, the imposition of sanctions, insofar as they are imposed upon the law firm Meisenheimer, is vacated.  Second, the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining that Meisenheimer pursued a meritless lawsuit, and that it knew or should have known that it was pursuing a meritless suit.  However, because the district court relied in part on a misstatement of Sixth Circuit law and without sufficient evidence imputed plaintiff-company's and the other law firm's improper purpose to Meisenheimer in finding that it had acted in bad faith, the judgment is vacated and remanded. 

Related Resource:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard