Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Schreiber v. Philips Display Components Co., No. 07-2440

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

In an ERISA action claiming that defendant breached its collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with, and violated fiduciary duties owed to, plaintiffs when it refused to provide plaintiffs with retiree health benefits, summary judgment for defendants is reversed where: 1) the district court erred in construing the CBA as including a specific durational clause limiting retiree healthcare benefits to the duration of the CBA; and 2) even if defendant-employer's transfer of assets was not a "fiduciary act," it was still required to comply with ERISA procedures.

Read Schreiber v. Philips Display Components Co., No. 07-2440

Appellate Information

Argued: October 23, 2008

Decided and Filed: September 2, 2009


Opinion by Judge White

Dissent by Judge Vinson


For Appellants:

David W. Zoll, Zoll, Kranz & Borgess, LLC, Toledo, OH

For Appellees:

Gregory V. Mersol, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Cleveland, OH

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard