Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

Smith v. Bradshaw, No. 07-4305

By FindLaw Staff on January 19, 2010 1:27 PM

A denial of a request for habeas relief by a defendant convicted and sentenced to death for raping and murdering a six-month-old baby is affirmed where: 1) defendant's claim that the prosecutor improperly commented on his failure to testify during the guilt phase is procedurally defaulted and defendant cannot excuse the default through the ineffectiveness of counsel because he cannot show that counsel's failure to object to this one comment -- thereby drawing attention to it -- was deficient; 2) defendant's claim that the penalty instructions violated Caldwell v. Mississippi is procedurally defaulted; 3) defendant's counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to the penalty instructions; and 4) a state court's analysis under Beck was reasonable as it is well established that a lesser-included offense instruction is not required where the facts of a murder so strongly indicate intent to kill that the jury could not rationally have a reasonable doubt as to the defendant's intent.     

Read Smith v. Bradshaw, No. 07-4305

Appellate Information

Argued: July 29, 2009

Decided and Filed: January 15, 2010


Opinion by Circuit Judge Boggs


For Appellant:  Joseph E. Wilhelm, Federal Public Defender's Office

For Appellee:  Charles L. Wille, Office of the Ohio Attorney General

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard