Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's wire fraud sentence is affirmed, where: 1) the District Court's failure to comply with 18 U.S.C. section 3664(d)(5) did not deprive it of jurisdiction to enter its restitution order; and 2) a District Court may rely on a defendant's education and future earning potential in setting a restitution payment schedule.
Read US v. Bogart, No. 07-3779
Appellate Information
Argued: June 18, 2009
Decided and Filed: August 14, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Clay
Counsel
For Appellant:
Frederick D. Benton, Jr., Law Office, Columbus, OH
For Appellee:
Brenda S. Shoemaker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: