Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Bogart, No. 07-3779

By FindLaw Staff on August 14, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's wire fraud sentence is affirmed, where: 1) the District Court's failure to comply with 18 U.S.C. section 3664(d)(5) did not deprive it of jurisdiction to enter its restitution order; and 2) a District Court may rely on a defendant's education and future earning potential in setting a restitution payment schedule.

Read US v. Bogart, No. 07-3779

Appellate Information

Argued: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 14, 2009


Opinion by Judge Clay


For Appellant:

Frederick D. Benton, Jr., Law Office, Columbus, OH

For Appellee:

Brenda S. Shoemaker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard