Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Camiscione, No. 08-4294

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Re-imposition of a sentence upon remand on a defendant convicted of possessing child pornography is vacated and remanded as the district court imposed its original sentence on defendant without considering general deterrence to the population at large and articulating how it avoids unwarranted sentence disparities under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(a).    

Read US v. Camiscione, No. 08-4294

Appellate Information

Argued: December 1, 2009

Decided and Filed: January 13, 2010

Judges

Opinion by Circuit Judge  Griffin

Counsel

For Appellant:  Daniel R. Ranke, Assistant US Attorney

For Appellee:   Anthony J. Vegh

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard