Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Elson, No. 07-3778

By FindLaw Staff on August 21, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an obstruction of justice prosecution, the restitution portion of Defendant's sentence is affirmed, where 1) the district court's application of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act to determine defendant's restitution obligation did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause; and 2) the plea colloquy indicated that the parties intended to include a broader range of acts in the offense of conviction than those related solely to the conspiracy to obstruct the grand jury investigation.

Read US v. Elson, No. 07-3778

Appellate Information

Argued: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 21, 2009


Opinion by Judge Clay


For Appellant:

Roger L. Kleinman, McDonald Hopkins LLC, Cleveland, OH

For Appellee:

Brenda S. Shoemaker, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, OH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard