Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Frechette, No. 08-2191

By FindLaw Staff | Last updated on

Judgment of the district court, granting defendant's motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the evidence of one-month subscription to child pornography was stale, is reversed and remanded where: 1) under the factors set forth in US v. Abboud, 438 F.3d 554 (6th Cir. 2006), the information presented to the magistrate judge was not stale; 2) the magistrate judge had a substantial basis to conclude that probable cause existed from the affidavit that the defendant, a registered sex offender, paid $79.95 to access a commercial child pornography web site using an email address and PayPal account connected to his residence; and 3) the magistrate judge could conclude that there was a fair probability that the evidence still existed sixteen months later. 

Read US v. Frechette, No. 08-2191

Appellate Information

Argued: August 6, 2009

Decided and Filed: October 8, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge Thapar


For Appellant:  Nils R. Kessler, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, Michigan

For Appellee:  Helen C. Nieuwenhuis, Nieuwenhuis Law Office, Grand Rapids, Michigan

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard