Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Grant, 07-3831

By FindLaw Staff on January 11, 2011 | Last updated on March 21, 2019
Challenge to district court's reduction of defendant's sentence for substantial assistance

US v. Grant, 07-3831, concerned a challenge to the district court's grant of government's motion to reduce defendant's sentence from twenty-five years to sixteen years, in a conviction of defendant for possession of a firearm, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and operation of a continuing criminal enterprise.

In affirming the district court's judgment, the court rejected defendant's argument that the resolution of a Rule 35(b) motion requires full Booker-type consideration of the section 3553(a) factors.  The court held that the district court acted within its discretion in refusing to consider defendant's section 3553(a)-based arguments.  Lastly, the court held that the district court properly calculated defendant's Guidelines range.

Related Link:

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard