Skip to main content

Are you a legal professional? Visit our professional site

Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Hardy, No. 08-5421

By FindLaw Staff on November 20, 2009 1:15 PM

In a prosecution for bank fraud and tax evasion, district court's exclusion of defense evidence on the ground that defendant failed to comply with the reciprocal discovery requirement of Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(c) is affirmed as the district court did not err in excluding the evidence, but even if the court did err, it was harmless error because the excluded evidence would not have created reasonable doubt.     

Read US v. Hardy, No. 08-5421

Appellate Information

Argued: October 13, 2009

Decided and Filed: November 20, 2009


Opinion by Senior District Judge Hood


For Appellant:   David W. Camp, Law Offices of David W. Camp

For Appellee:  R. Leigh Grinalds, Assistant US Attorney

Copied to clipboard