Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
Defendant's sentence for illegally reentering the U.S. is affirmed where: 1) the District Court had the authority to reject the Sentencing Guidelines on policy grounds; and 2) because the Guidelines are advisory only, the particular methodology set forth in U.S.S.G. section 4A1.3 is not binding.
Read US v. Herrera-Zuniga, No. 08-1540
Appellate Information
Argued: April 23, 2009
Decided and Filed: July 8, 2009
Judges
Opinion by Judge Clay
Counsel
For Appellant:
Richard D. Stroba, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Grand Rapids, MI
For Appellee:
Jennifer L. McManus, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: