Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Huntington Nat'l. Bank, No. 08-1729

By FindLaw Staff on July 27, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

In an action by a lender seeking to recover assets from a borrower that were seized by the government, a ruling for the government is reversed where the lender preserved its argument that it was a bona fide purchaser by stating the issue to the district court with sufficient clarity to give the court and opposing parties notice that it was asserting the issue.

Read US v. Huntington Nat'l. Bank, No. 08-1729

Appellate Information

Argued: April 20, 2009

Decided and Filed: July 27, 2009


Opinion by Judge Sutton


For Appellant:

Jeffrey O. Birkhold, Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, Grand Rapids, MI

For Appellee:

Matthew G. Borgula, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard