US v. Huntington Nat'l. Bank, No. 08-1729
In an action by a lender seeking to recover assets from a borrower that were seized by the government, a ruling for the government is reversed where the lender preserved its argument that it was a bona fide purchaser by stating the issue to the district court with sufficient clarity to give the court and opposing parties notice that it was asserting the issue.
Read US v. Huntington Nat'l. Bank, No. 08-1729
Argued: April 20, 2009
Decided and Filed: July 27, 2009
Opinion by Judge Sutton
Jeffrey O. Birkhold, Warner Norcross & Judd LLP, Grand Rapids, MI
Matthew G. Borgula, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.