Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Johnson, No. 08-3925

By FindLaw Staff on June 30, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendants' drug possession sentences are affirmed where neither Defendant was eligible for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2), because their sentences were based solely on powder cocaine, meaning that Amendment 706 to the Guidelines would not have the effect of lowering their sentences.

Read US v. Johnson, No. 08-3925

Appellate Information

Submitted: June 18, 2009

Decided and Filed: June 30, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Moore

Counsel

For Appellant:

Andy P. Hart, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Toledo, OH

For Appellee:

Blas E. Serrano, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Cleveland, OH

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard