Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Maye, No. 07-4311

By FindLaw Staff on October 05, 2009 12:44 PM

Defendant's conviction and sentence for distributing more than five grams of crack and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime is vacated and remanded for new plea acceptance and sentencing hearings where: 1) the district court committed plain error in carrying out its Rule 11 duties, which clearly affected defendant's substantial rights and as such, defendant is entitled to another opportunity to plead to the 18 U.S.C. section 924(c) charge; and 2) defendant's sentence for distribution of crack cocaine is vacated and remanded as there is reason to believe the district court judge did not recognize his authority to reject and vary from the crack cocaine Guidelines based solely on a policy disagreement with those Guidelines.     

Read US v. Maye, No. 07-4311

Appellate Information

Argued: March 11, 2009

Decided and Filed: October 5, 2009


Opinion by Circuit Judge Daughtrey


For Appellant:  Michael M. Losavio, Louisville, Kentucky

For Appellee:  Salvador A. Dominguez, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbus, Ohio

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard