Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812

By FindLaw Staff on September 28, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

District court's post-judgment order denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is affirmed as the appeal lacked merit and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is not a vehicle for convicts to raise unrelated sentencing challenges that they had previously overlooked or omitted.     

Read US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812

Appellate Information

Argued: April 23, 2009

Decided and Filed: September 28, 2009


Opinion by Chief Judge Batchelder


For Appellant:  Sharon A. Turek, Federal Public Defender's Office

For Appellee:  Mark V. Courtade, Assistant United States Attorney

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard