US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812

District court's post-judgment order denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is affirmed as the appeal lacked merit and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is not a vehicle for convicts to raise unrelated sentencing challenges that they had previously overlooked or omitted.     

Read US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812

Argued: April 23, 2009

Decided and Filed: September 28, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Chief Judge Batchelder

Counsel

For Appellant:  Sharon A. Turek, Federal Public Defender's Office

For Appellee:  Mark V. Courtade, Assistant United States Attorney