US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812
District court's post-judgment order denying defendant's motion for a sentence reduction is affirmed as the appeal lacked merit and 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) is not a vehicle for convicts to raise unrelated sentencing challenges that they had previously overlooked or omitted.
Read US v. Metcalfe, No. 08-1812
Argued: April 23, 2009
Decided and Filed: September 28, 2009
Opinion by Chief Judge Batchelder
For Appellant: Sharon A. Turek, Federal Public Defender's Office
For Appellee: Mark V. Courtade, Assistant United States Attorney
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.
Or contact an attorney near you: