Civil Rights
Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
District court's denial of defendant's motion to dismiss his indictment for conspiracy to commit computer fraud is affirmed where: 1) defendant did not properly preserve his factual specificity of the indictment argument; 2) defendant failed to establish that the face of the indictment failed to charge the elements of a federal offense; 3) no violation of the statute of limitations occurred as the indictment was returned within five years of the last act in furtherance of the conspiracy; 4) defendant failed to demonstrate that he was actually prejudiced by a pre-indictment delay; and 5) the district court committed no error in denying defendant's motion to dismiss based upon entrapment as a matter of law.
Read US v. Schaffer, No. 09-3053
Appellate Information
Argued: July 29, 2009
Decided and Filed: November 12, 2009
Judges
Opinion by District Judge Vantatenhove
Counsel
For Appellant: Richard G. Lillie, Lillie & Holderman, Cleveland, Ohio
For Appellee: Daniel R. Ranke, Assistant US Attorney, Cleveland, Ohio
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.
Sign InCreate an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: