Block on Trump's Asylum Ban Upheld by Supreme Court
In a prosecution of defendant for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence of the firearm is affirmed as officers' actions did not violate the Fourth Amendment where: 1) officers' initial contact with defendant, as they entered the building in an attempt to respond to an emergency 911 call, did not result in a seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and 2) when an officer told defendant to stop, there was a proper basis for an investigatory Terry stop and the degree of intrusion at issue was reasonably related in scope to the situation at hand.
Argued: January 21, 2010
Decided and Filed: February 10, 2010
Opinion by Circuit Judge McKeague
For Appellee: Karl P. Kadon, III, Assistant US Attorney
Sign into your Legal Forms and Services account to manage your estate planning documents.Sign In
Create an account allows to take advantage of these benefits: