US v. Stall, No. 08-4064
District court's sentencing of a defendant convicted of possession of child pornography to one day of incarceration and a ten-year period of supervised release is affirmed as the government at sentencing put forward almost no evidence for why a sentence within the Guidelines was warranted and did not raise the argument it now raised on appeal, and the district court's explanation for the extent of its downward variance was sufficient in light of the record made before it.
Argued: August 5, 2009
Decided and Filed: September11, 2009
Opinion by Judge Boggs
Dissent by Judge Rogers
For Appellant: Bejamine C. Glassman, Assistant United States Attorney
For Appellee: Scott Aaron Rubenstein, Rubenstein & Thurman, LPA
You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help
Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.