Skip to main content
Please enter a legal issue and/or a location
Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select

Find a Lawyer

More Options

US v. Studabaker, No. 08-1614

By FindLaw Staff on August 24, 2009 | Last updated on March 21, 2019

Defendant's conviction and sentence for causing the foreign travel of a minor with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity are affirmed where: 1) his prosecution did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; 2) defendant did not reserve the right to appeal the sufficiency of the evidence, and thus waived his argument that the government did not provide a sufficient factual basis to support his plea; and 3) the district court did not abuse its discretion when it rejected defendant's argument that his sentence should be reduced to account for his prior incarceration.

Read US v. Studabaker, No. 08-1614

Appellate Information

Argued: August 5, 2009

Decided and Filed: August 24, 2009


Opinion by Judge Moore


For Appellant:

Kerry M. Donahue, Bellinger & Donahue, Dublin, OH

For Appellee:

Daniel Y. Mekaru, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
Copied to clipboard