Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

US v. Tinklenberg, No. 06-2646

FindLaw Staff

Article by: FindLaw Staff

Last updated on

Defendant's firearm possession conviction is reversed and the district court is instructed to dismiss the indictment with prejudice where the length of time between defendant's indictment and prosecution violated the Speedy Trial Act, and a reprosecution would be contrary to the administration of justice because defendant had already served the entirety of his sentence, as well as his sentence for violating his supervised release.

Read US v. Tinklenberg, No. 06-2646

Appellate Information

Argued: June 19, 2009

Decided and Filed: September 3, 2009

Judges

Opinion by Judge Clay

Counsel

For Appellant:

Kevin M. Schad, Schad & Schad, Lebanon, OH

For Appellee:

Julie Ann Woods, Assistant United States Attorney, Grand Rapids, MI

Was this helpful?

You Don’t Have To Solve This on Your Own – Get a Lawyer’s Help

Meeting with a lawyer can help you understand your options and how to best protect your rights. Visit our attorney directory to find a lawyer near you who can help.

Or contact an attorney near you:
SPONSORED
Copied to clipboard